Annual theme

 

Subscribe to
our mailing list

* indicates required

PROGRAMME PARTNER
 

City of Zagreb
City Office for Physical Planning, Construction, Communal Affairs and Traffic


 

Faculty of Architecture
University of Zagreb


 

City Acupuncture


 

Oris - House of Architecture


 

SUPPORTED BY

 

City of Zagreb
City Office for Culture, Education and Sport


 

Republic of Croatia
Ministry of Culture


Work title: 2 public spaces in Vienna

Description:
The analysis of the history and current condition of public space in Vienna, is a fine indicator of the current condition of urban design today. As read in the brief we are witnessing that private interests transform into public ones while the public institution lose their public character in a sociological sense as they get transformed into private undertakings. In the case of the Museeumsquartier in Vienna the case is even more special. During the making the city of Vienna privatized itself, so to speak, in creating the MQ-Holding. What is so extraordinary in this case is that the general public would not had recognized it, if not in cause of the Euro 2008 that the MQ-Holding was forced to exercised there domiciliary right and forbid people to bring their own beer. It is even more public then Heldenplatz, the most political and public space that Vienna has to offer. The categories of private and public are crumbling away in our hands as Manuel Sola Morales used to say. The MQ is without question a generator of urbanity The MQ-Holding is a private holding and it is a commercial undertaking and it is private space that they are managing, but it is not private space in terms of use and significance for the city of Vienna. In reality it doesn’t matter whether urban space is under private or public management, nor whether it constitutes real or virtual space or something in between, every point of access and activity in this space requires political negotiation. It appears that there is too much emphasis on the opposition of those to spheres, while we as architects never design and focus on one person, the individual , nor exclusively on one group the collective as the opposition, or just not about anyone else or the “outside world”. It is always a question about the individual and the collective and there interrelation. In architecture the form of this impossible condition It differs in the end in a series of spatial qualities in relation to accessibility, responsibility and the relation between private properties and the supervision of spatial conditions. However, when obstacles occur it is in our responsibility and we as architetcs are to blame if we do not reformulate the approach accordingly. “…what people are always so diligently subtracting from vir¬gin-open-exterior space with the help of material and construction, all too often closes in the process. Instead of being “interiorized”, it is rendered empty, and emptiness (the perforated solid) is so very malicious. It is pre¬cisely because constructing in exterior space inevitably entails demarca¬tion, enclosure, separation, and size reduction that I now wish to place special emphasis on the quality which does not survive all this limiting acivity without conscious effort: openness. This quality, therefore, demands all the more attention. It is in the fact the very thing architects in particular are required to maintain: to reconstitute by means of construction, thus keeping open what (without their special care and competence) would otherwise close.” – Aldo van Eyck The Point of departure in the design is to take the unfinished work of Gottfried Semper and turn it 90°. This intervebtion brings us somehow back to the condition of Vienna around 1845 where the place in front of the emperor castle was used as parade ground in juxtaposition of the private Burggarden of the emperor Franz Joseph I and the public Volksgarden. A promising approach.
Work details
Application Number 0000703014
Author Puck, Andreas Wolfgang, Austria

Juror Comments

  • Juror @ 04/08/2015 10:39:53
    Stronger in theoretical aspect than in the very proposal. Interesting comment on the status of privately owned and publicly used spaces.
  • Juror @ 03/08/2015 19:26:22
    The comment on the reality of public space illustrated in the case of Museums Quartier in Vienna is appreciated. The project illustrates a public space functioning independently of public or private management as well as the idea of turning Semper’s unfinished work by 90 degrees is opening up borders and making the concept interesting.
  • Juror @ 03/08/2015 13:51:31
    A serious and elaborate project.
  • Juror @ 03/08/2015 23:17:17
    A consistent analysis and argument, to academic however and self-referential, but smart. Puts history in the argument and offers a quality collection of writings.
back to list